There is nothing exactly wrong with Young Adult (YA)
literature, except that, not surprisingly, I am discovering that I’m too old
for it. In this statement I exclude the Harry Potter series because that is one
of the most well-crafted beautiful stories of our time. But the rest of the books
that cater to the dystopian/fantasy craze that is sweeping the nation are
disappointingly lacking. Just the other day I picked up a book that a friend
had recommended and I couldn’t even get through the first chapter. It wasn’t
that I could tell this was the same story I’d read in every other YA book – as discussed
in an earlier blog post, no one really writes new stories – it was something
else. There was something missing that wasn’t missing from Rowling’s books.
So naturally I went back and began rereading the series.
While reading, I came across a section that lifted the veil ever so slightly
and it was as though I could see Rowling at her desk writing, and chuckling as
she did so at the witty words she was penning. (I know she probably uses a
computer, but when I picture authors, they are always handwriting the story,
usually with a quill and dressed like they are from the 19th century
for some reason.) This happened often when I was reading Dickens as a child. I’m
pretty sure the image below was burned into my brain long before I ever
actually saw it:
Credit: Google Images |
You see, what these YA popular fiction books are missing is
voice. Not just those delightful moments where the author can get away with commenting
almost directly to the reader, but in general. I know that voice varies
depending on point-of-view and a number of other things, and I’m not trying to
argue that every author should insert their authorial presence all over the
book. I am arguing that stories need a voice (narrative, authorial, anything)
like my dog needs food in the morning: without it they are dead.
Since I’ve been reading these rather dull tales crafted for
today’s youth, I have realized that there is nothing like the voice of Dickens
filling the space after the cruel and unjust act of a character with a rant
against the social evils of his day. It is like the chorus of a song,
heightening the tension and unifying the reader, the writer, and the
characters.
And there is nothing quite like Rowling’s quiet voice
asserting that “it is a strange thing, but when you are dreading something, and
would give anything to slow time down, it has a disobliging habit of speeding
up” (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
317).
So this is what was missing and I think I know why.
I had one of the best classes of students last year that I
think I am ever likely to have; often, while trudging through Julius Caesar, my students would be
sitting with brows furrowed, trying to decipher the language (they were honors
students, so I’m not making this up, they really were trying). Shakespeare is a
very funny man, so sometimes I would read a line and pause, waiting for them to
chuckle. Silence. “It’s a joke guys. It’s ok, you can laugh.” They would look
up confused. I’d explain it to them. A rather lame attempt at a laugh would
circulate briefly and we’d continue. I don’t blame them in the slightest for
not understanding Shakespeare, but I do blame them for missing the humor in
easier pieces. I blame them for missing the subtle humor often layered in the
tone of a sentence. Because there is a grave result from the fact that much of the younger
generations don’t read: they’ve lost the art of subtlety. They are used to
everything being violently overt, thanks to sitcoms, televisions, and movies. And with that loss of the understanding of subtlety goes the
voice of authors everywhere as they write novels that cater to the youth of
today.
I don’t believe that every author should always launch into
rants about the state of the world or constantly lift the veil to wink at their
reader. But I do think that every author needs a well developed voice that is
grounded in the subtleties of tone, that supports their narrative, and, quite
frankly, makes their book worth reading.
Then again, maybe we just need to add laugh tracks to books.
Nathan Bransford recently wrote about this same thing. ;-)
ReplyDeleteI haven't been on his blog in ages, but I'm going to go search for that post. :)
Delete